Riemann theta functions arise in the study of *integrable differential
equations* that have applications in many areas, including fluid mechanics
(Ablowitz and Segur (1981, Chapter 4)), magnetic monopoles
(Ercolani and Sinha (1989)), and string theory
(Deligne et al. (1999, Part 3)). Typical examples of such equations are the
Korteweg–de Vries equation

21.9.1 | $$4{u}_{t}=6u{u}_{x}+{u}_{xxx},$$ | ||

and the nonlinear Schrödinger equations

21.9.2 | $$\mathrm{i}{u}_{t}=-\frac{1}{2}{u}_{xx}\pm {|u|}^{2}u.$$ | ||

Here, and in what follows, $x,y$, and $t$ suffixes indicate partial derivatives.

Particularly important for the use of Riemann theta functions is the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili (KP) equation, which describes the propagation of two-dimensional, long-wave length surface waves in shallow water (Ablowitz and Segur (1981, Chapter 4)):

21.9.3 | $${(-4{u}_{t}+6u{u}_{x}+{u}_{xxx})}_{x}+3{u}_{yy}=0.$$ | ||

Here $x$ and $y$ are spatial variables, $t$ is time, and $u(x,y,t)$ is the elevation of the surface wave. All quantities are made dimensionless by a suitable scaling transformation. The KP equation has a class of quasi-periodic solutions described by Riemann theta functions, given by

21.9.4 | $$u(x,y,t)=c+2\frac{{\partial}^{2}}{{\partial x}^{2}}\mathrm{ln}\left(\theta \left(\mathbf{k}x+\mathbf{l}y+\mathit{\omega}t+\mathit{\varphi}\right|\mathbf{\Omega})\right),$$ | ||

where $c$ is a complex constant and $\mathbf{k}$, $\mathbf{l}$, $\mathit{\omega}$, and $\mathit{\varphi}$ are $g$-dimensional complex vectors; see Krichever (1976). These parameters, including $\mathbf{\Omega}$, are not free: they are determined by a compact, connected Riemann surface (Krichever (1976)), or alternatively by an appropriate initial condition $u(x,y,0)$ (Deconinck and Segur (1998)). These solutions have been compared successfully with physical experiments for $g=1,2$ (Wiegel (1960), Hammack et al. (1989), and Hammack et al. (1995)). See Figures 21.9.1 and 21.9.2.

Furthermore, the solutions of the KP equation solve the *Schottky
problem*: this is the question concerning conditions that a Riemann matrix
needs to satisfy in order to be associated with a Riemann surface
(Schottky (1903)). Following the work of Krichever (1976),
Novikov conjectured that the Riemann theta function in (21.9.4)
gives rise to a solution of the KP equation (21.9.3) if, and only if,
the theta function originates from a Riemann surface; see
Dubrovin (1981, §IV.4). The first part of this conjecture was
established in Krichever (1976); the second part was proved in
Shiota (1986).